WASPE 30K vs WASPE 40K: Catalog Comparison

For an eligible adult buyer comparing WASPE 30K vs WASPE 40K, the current Artifact Vapor records list 28 mL, 850 mAh, adjustable airflow, 0%/2%/5% nicotine and 16 named options for the 30K record; the 40K record lists 36 mL, 850 mAh, USB-C charging and 2%/5% nicotine, but no comparable named option list. This is an editorial selection framework based on catalog records, not a product test or a review. Confirm the exact offered SKU, option sheet, commercial terms and destination eligibility in writing.

Audience: adults who meet the destination’s requirements, including small-order buyers and B2B retail, purchasing or distribution teams. This page does not state price, availability, pack quantity, MOQ, lead time, legal eligibility or performance.

WASPE 30K product image from the reviewed Artifact Vapor catalog
WASPE 30K catalog media, used for product identification.
WASPE 40K product image from the reviewed Artifact Vapor catalog
WASPE 40K catalog media, used for product identification.

Quick catalog comparison

Reviewed field WASPE 30K WASPE 40K
Catalog SKU AV-waspe-30000 AV-waspe-fihp-40000
Model designation 30K supplier/manufacturer-stated model designation; not an Artifact Vapor puff test. 40K supplier/manufacturer-stated model designation; not an Artifact Vapor puff test.
Capacity 28 mL 36 mL
Battery 850 mAh 850 mAh
Recorded feature Adjustable airflow USB-C charging
Listed nicotine options 0%, 2%, 5% 2%, 5%
Named options recorded 16 Not specified as a comparable named list on the reviewed source; the record offers a random-flavor selection.
Product-specific MOQ / case quantity Not specified on the reviewed source. Not specified on the reviewed source.

What this comparison supports

The table reports only fields expressly supplied by the live WASPE 30K product record and WASPE 40K product record. The 30K and 40K labels are catalog designations, not measured duration, battery-life or usage claims. A field missing from either record is not completed from images, third-party listings or a similarly named product.

The two records share an 850 mAh battery entry. That is a catalog field, not a prediction of actual duration. The 30K record additionally lists adjustable airflow, while the 40K record lists USB-C charging. Neither entry establishes other unlisted features, confirms a current order configuration or qualifies a model for a destination.

Editorial selection framework for adult purchasing tasks

This is editorial analysis, not a superiority claim. When a request specifically needs a source-recorded capacity field, the current records show 28 mL for WASPE 30K and 36 mL for WASPE 40K. That difference is useful for an inquiry worksheet, but it does not prove actual consumption, duration, quality or the characteristics of every batch.

For option planning, the 30K record contains 16 named options. The 40K entry does not present an equivalent named list, so this page does not turn its random-flavor selection into a count. A purchasing team can use that distinction to request a current option sheet for each exact SKU. It should not assume that every recorded option is presently offered, can be combined in one order or is suitable for the destination.

The listed nicotine options also need a model-specific check: the 30K record shows 0%, 2% and 5%, whereas the 40K record shows 2% and 5%. This is not a recommendation, health claim or market-eligibility conclusion. Record the requested option alongside the exact SKU and obtain written confirmation for the offered version.

Use the matrix before asking for a quotation

Start with the product URL and SKU rather than the family name. In the first two worksheet columns, write AV-waspe-30000 or AV-waspe-fihp-40000, then the selected option. In separate columns, retain the source-recorded capacity, battery field and the one model-specific feature. This avoids silently converting a missing field into an assumed difference.

Next, keep product identification separate from commercial confirmation. The matrix helps define the question; it cannot determine a current price, quantity basis, whether selected options can be combined, warehouse, lead time or destination documents. Ask for those items in the supplier’s dated written response for the offered SKU. If the response identifies a different SKU, packaging or option list, correct the record before proceeding.

Questions the source matrix can answer

Use the matrix to resolve one documented field at a time. For example, an inquiry that requires a listed charging interface can identify that the reviewed 40K record names USB-C charging. It should not turn that fact into a claim that the 30K lacks charging: the reviewed 30K source does not state an equivalent charging field. Likewise, the 30K record names adjustable airflow, but the 40K source’s silence does not prove the opposite. Retaining that distinction is more useful than forcing a neat feature checklist from incomplete records.

Capacity and nicotine entries can be treated the same way. The numbers in the table are source-recorded fields for the exact catalog records, and the option lists are catalog entries rather than a live allocation promise. A buyer can use them to state an evidence-backed request, then ask the supplier to return the matching SKU, selected option, date and commercial units. If a response changes any of those identifiers, the comparison is no longer the factual basis for the offer and should be reviewed again.

Questions the matrix deliberately leaves open

Neither source supplies a product-specific MOQ or case quantity, so the comparison does not estimate either value. It also does not state price, inventory, delivery timing, destination qualification, test results or actual service life. Those items are order and destination facts, not safe deductions from the model name, catalog image, capacity, battery entry or nominal 30K/40K designation.

For a retailer or distributor, this boundary is practical: save the comparison with the inquiry, but make the quotation the authoritative record for commercial conditions. For a small-order buyer, first check whether the exact offer meets the documented conditions for the intended order, then request confirmation rather than interpreting an older catalog note as a current commercial promise.

The WASPE category and shop remain the discovery and transaction paths. The comparison should be used as a narrow documentation aid, not as a substitute for the product page or quotation.

For an eligible small-order inquiry

Identify one model and one exact option before starting the request. If the offer has the confirmed 10-identical-unit condition, the 10-unit order checklist can help organize the inquiry. It does not establish mixed-option ordering, stock, pricing or destination eligibility.

For a retailer, purchaser or distributor

Keep the two SKUs in separate rows. Add the selected option, quotation date, commercial unit and destination-document request to each row. The product verification documentation guide supports the identity check, while the MOQ and case-quantity guide helps ensure that any commercial unit is expressed rather than assumed.

Buyer verification checklist

  1. Copy the exact product URL and SKU into the inquiry.
  2. Name the selected nicotine option and any requested flavor; do not assume every recorded option is offered.
  3. Record capacity, battery and the model-specific feature exactly as shown in the reviewed source.
  4. Request the current product-specific MOQ, inner-pack and master-case quantities in writing.
  5. Request the current option sheet, product documents and destination evidence for the offered version.
  6. Compare the quotation, option sheet and packaging identifiers before approving the record.

Limitations and source review

Reviewed 4 September 2026. Artifact Vapor product records are the factual source for this comparison; live exact-model search results were reviewed only to confirm comparison context and were not used for product specifications. No external test, sample result, price, availability statement, popularity, performance, legal conclusion or delivery statement is used here. Catalog fields can change by version or batch, so confirm the offered record in writing.

Source review date: 4 September 2026. The comparison keeps the two current Artifact Vapor records separate because a model name alone does not prove a shared production version, option set or commercial arrangement.

Request a model-specific record

Contact Artifact Vapor with the destination, purchaser type, exact model, selected option, quantity basis and requested documents. Ask the team to confirm the current record for WASPE 30K or WASPE 40K; do not rely on this comparison alone for commercial availability or destination qualification.

Prepared by Artifact Vapor Catalog & Documentation Team. This comparison is a source-limited catalog analysis, not a review or product test.