WASPE Crystal 40K vs WASPE 60K: source-limited catalog comparison
For an eligible adult buyer comparing two current WASPE catalog records, the practical distinction is simple: the Crystal 40K record lists a 32 mL capacity and an 850 mAh battery, while the WASPE 60K record lists 54 mL and 650 mAh. Both records list USB-C charging and 2%/5% nicotine options. This is a source-limited catalog comparison, not a product test and not a review; the model names are supplier/manufacturer-stated designations, not verified usage results.
Use this page to prepare an exact-SKU quotation request, not to infer price, availability, pack size, destination eligibility, performance, or commercial terms. Confirm those items in writing for the chosen SKU and destination.
| Documented field | WASPE Crystal 40K | WASPE 60K |
|---|---|---|
| Artifact Vapor SKU | AV-waspe-Crystal-40000 | AV-waspe-60000 |
| Model designation | 40K supplier/manufacturer-stated model claim; not an Artifact Vapor puff test | 60K supplier/manufacturer-stated model claim; not an Artifact Vapor puff test |
| Capacity | 32 mL | 54 mL |
| Battery | 850 mAh | 650 mAh |
| Charging | USB-C charging | USB-C charging |
| Listed nicotine options | 2%, 5% | 2%, 5% |
| Named flavor list | Not specified as a named list; the record offers a random-flavor selection | Not specified as a named list; the record offers a random-flavor selection |
| Product-specific MOQ / case quantity | Not specified on the reviewed source | Not specified on the reviewed source |

What is documented, and what is not
The documented comparison starts with the two live WASPE Crystal 40K product record and WASPE 60K product record, reviewed on 5 September 2026. The capacity and battery values above are catalog fields, not measurements made by Artifact Vapor. Each model’s 40K or 60K label is likewise a supplier/manufacturer statement, rather than a claim about observed consumption, duration, or output.
Both records name USB-C charging and the same 2%/5% nicotine options. Neither record provides a comparable named flavor list: each shows a random-flavor selection. Neither reviewed source specifies product-specific MOQ, inner-pack quantity, master-case quantity, current unit price, stock confirmation, dispatch warehouse, lead time, or destination approval. Those fields are deliberately excluded from the comparison rather than guessed.
How an adult small-order or trade buyer can use the difference
This section is an editorial selection framework derived from the documented fields, not a superiority claim. A buyer whose written sourcing brief needs the Crystal 40K SKU can use its 32 mL and 850 mAh entries as fields to re-confirm. A buyer whose brief calls for the 60K SKU can use the 54 mL and 650 mAh entries in the same way. The documented capacity and battery fields differ; the pages do not provide a tested basis for deciding which will last longer, perform better, or suit a particular person.
For a retail, purchasing, or distribution workflow, decide the exact SKU before asking commercial questions. Then compare the returned quotation against the product record. This keeps catalog facts, quotation facts, and destination-specific documentation separate. Browse the wider WASPE catalog category or shop only if you need to identify a different model; it does not validate a substitution.

Field-by-field reading notes
Capacity and battery
The reviewed records state 32 mL / 850 mAh for Crystal 40K and 54 mL / 650 mAh for WASPE 60K. These are the only capacity and battery comparisons made here. They do not establish real-world duration, recharge frequency, efficiency, output, or any other performance result.
Charging and nicotine options
Both product records explicitly list USB-C charging and 2%/5% nicotine options. The statement only reports the published catalog fields. It is not an availability statement, a destination-eligibility assessment, or a recommendation to use a nicotine product.
Options and commercial data
The sources do not give a comparable named flavor list, so no flavor-count comparison is made. They also do not supply product-specific MOQ or case quantities. If your order path permits a one-box request, the separate 10-unit order checklist explains the documented identical-variant requirement; it does not confirm that either model is currently available in that quantity.
A decision path that keeps the records separate
Start with the product identity, not the model-number label. The Crystal 40K record carries SKU AV-waspe-Crystal-40000; the WASPE 60K record carries SKU AV-waspe-60000. Put one of those codes in the request subject line, together with the selected nicotine option. That is the simplest way to make a quotation answerable without assuming that a similarly named product is the same record.
Next, decide which documented fields must appear in a supplier reply. If capacity and battery are relevant to the purchasing brief, cite the catalog values exactly: 32 mL and 850 mAh for Crystal 40K, or 54 mL and 650 mAh for WASPE 60K. Do not turn those values into a predicted number of uses, a performance promise, or a comparison of longevity. The two records do not publish the method or evidence needed for that conclusion.
Then separate model facts from commercial facts. Product-specific MOQ, case configuration, current price, inventory, warehouse, dispatch timing, payment terms, and destination paperwork must be obtained from a dated written quotation. A catalog comparison can tell a buyer which SKU to ask about; it cannot confirm whether that SKU can be supplied or accepted for a particular order.
Finally, retain the comparison and supplier reply together in the purchasing file. The record date on this page is 5 September 2026, while the final quote may be later. Treat the quotation as a fresh confirmation step, and ask the supplier to identify any field that has changed rather than silently substituting an alternative.
What this comparison does not decide
This page does not decide legal eligibility, age qualification, product availability, purchase suitability, health impact, or a destination’s requirements. It does not say either model is preferable, safer, more reliable, longer lasting, or better tasting. It also does not establish that the two records can be ordered at the same quantity or under the same terms. Those are separate questions requiring written, model-specific confirmation.
Similarly, a shared nicotine-options entry does not resolve which option is permissible or available for a destination. The entry simply reports the 2% and 5% options listed in each reviewed catalog record on 5 September 2026. The named flavor field is intentionally left as “not specified as a named list” because neither record presents a comparable list.
Copyable quotation verification checklist
- Name the exact requested SKU: AV-waspe-Crystal-40000 or AV-waspe-60000.
- Repeat the selected nicotine option and ask for a dated option sheet; do not treat a random-flavor selection as a named option list.
- Ask for product-specific MOQ, inner-pack and master-case quantities; record them separately from the catalog comparison.
- Ask for a dated availability check, price, warehouse, dispatch timing, and destination documents in writing.
- Match the resulting SKU, option, packaging, and batch evidence using the product verification documentation workflow.
Limits and source review
Sources reviewed 5 September 2026: the two linked Artifact Vapor product records. This page compares only fields that those records expressly state. It does not use third-party specifications, reviews, pricing, inventory, pack assumptions, test results, legal conclusions, or claims about suitability for a destination. Confirm eligibility, availability, and commercial terms in writing before any order is accepted.
Prepared by the Artifact Vapor Catalog & Documentation Team. The team’s editorial role here is to organize stated catalog fields and identify unknowns; it has not tested, sampled, or independently verified the products.
Request the exact comparison fields
When contacting the sales team, include the exact SKU, selected nicotine option, intended quantity, business details, and destination. Ask the reply to confirm the current product record and quotation fields rather than relying on a similar model name.